Put your economic theory where your mouth is!
Alrighty, JU, here's the deal. I'm stumped.
A certain outspoken and intensely focused member of our community has recently made the following comment:
"For the average American to be unable to buy as much this year as they did last year with their income is not economic growth. As far as jobs are concerned it depends of how much they pay and what benefits are included. IF A PERSON HAS A JOB(S) THAT DO NOT PROVIDE THE INCOME NEEDED TO LIVE, THAT IS NOT A SOLUTION."
I guess I missed the edition of Conservative Sheep Magazine that covered this, but I have no idea what to say to this.
Anybody else want to take a crack at it?
Argue on the merits only, please. No namecalling or brush-offs. If you can't make a substantial and constructive comment, please stay away from this article.