What now? I'll tell you what now.
Published on December 13, 2005 By stutefish In Current Events
#3 by STRES2
Tuesday, December 13, 2005




Things are not what they may first seem. Read it and you might understand what i'm saying. people are too rushy rushy, give things a little bit of time and you will be rewarded with understanding. This blog is not for deaf ears. If you are not willing to take the time to understand what is being written then this isn't for you.

There is a rule that undermines all yours. it's called freedom of speech. and if my words fall on deaf ears so be it.

Read the title, read the text, find peace within yourself and understanding will surely follow.

Bonus Rating: Trolling Insightful




Tookie's case was the subject of intense legal debate for 25 years. His execution was possibly the least-rushed act of criminal justice in our generation. How much longer do we need to wait for "understanding" in this matter?

Comments
on Dec 13, 2005
You really don't get how this blogging thing works, do you????
on Dec 13, 2005
I don't understand what he is doing. Which of the text above did he write? And what is he referring to?

Is he the one who shouted in the forums?
on Dec 13, 2005
I don't understand what he is doing

Neither do I.

Which of the text above did he write?

I'm still trying to figure it out.

And what is he referring to?

I think that it's Tookie Williams' death, but I'm not sure.

Is he the one who shouted in the forums?

Yes. He also claimed to have shouted only once on my blog, which was untrue. It was three times, and I warned him not to do it again. He did, so I blacklisted him. Then he went and copied pretty much the entire thread and posted it as an article - except he posted his own comment on the bottom and didn't bother to tell anyone that that wasn't part of the original thread.

I don't know if he's got a screw loose or if he really doesn't understand how this works yet. I do know that he's managed to make it onto Greywar's blacklist with a single solitary article. That's really quite a feat.
on Dec 13, 2005
WhAt? I Do NoT UnDeRsTaNd yOuR PoInT! HeH
on Dec 13, 2005

Stute, I am against capital punishment.  BUt I refuse to canvas for those so condemned on the grounds of my opposition.  I want to convince everyone that it is wrong and we should change the laws.  And yes, in the rare cases that there is room for doubt, to stop them (as happened in Va).  But I will not support the efforts to lionize what by all accounts is a despicable, unrepentant person to further my beliefs.

I will not lay down with the devil in the fight for right. period.

on Dec 13, 2005
AHAHAHAHAHAH

Sorry for the confusion, guys.

But I have to say I was a little bit glad to get such an interesting and amusing comments thread
on Dec 13, 2005
No worries, Guy. This was more a spoof of STRES2's blogging style, than a serious attempt at debating capital punishment.
on Dec 13, 2005

No worries, Guy. This was more a spoof of STRES2's blogging style, than a serious attempt at debating capital punishment.

Oh well, maybe another day.  I thought the last was yours, but I gave up on that clown long before the last must have been written.

on Dec 14, 2005
Psssst. This is stutes thread, not the weirdo's. He's quoted said weirdo above the horizontal rule, and responded to the bolded part underneath.

DoH!


DoH! Is right!

Sorry....